Saturday, October 25, 2014

Union Representation for Career School in Chelsea (Micropower 2013 Vote Story)



Teachers at Career School in Chelsea Vote Decisively for Union Representation

New York, NY – September 14, 2013 – Management response to Hurricane Sandy was the galvanizing moment for many teachers at the Manhattan branch of Micropower Career Institute. Despite a fierce union busting effort by the owners of this family-run proprietary school (Sam Hiranandey, President and Lalit Chabria, Vice-President), teachers made their desire for unionization clear as a strong majority voted for union representation in an election overseen by the National Labor Relations Board.

The West 25th branch of Micropower markets ESL programs especially for students seeking visas for studying in the States, and offers Dental Assistant, Medical Assistant, and Computer Networking certificate programs. Tuition – which can run over $13,000 for some programs – isn’t cheap, but Micropower pays most of its teachers $15 to $18 per hour without any benefits, even for those who work full time (or more) hours.

The owners’ profit margin became especially galling to many teachers after Hurricane Sandy when, despite not returning student’s tuition monies for the seven days the branch was closed, Micropower management refused to pay teachers for those days when school was not in session. A letter to management signed by about a third of the faculty which read in part, “…since most of New York’s educational institutions have acknowledged the efforts of their teachers by compensating them for lost wages, we the ESL faculty, appeal to the administration to acknowledge our contributions by compensating us for lost wages during the hurricane” was ignored and shortly thereafter teachers contacted organizers at New York State United Teachers for help with starting a union drive.

Management retained the notorious anti-worker law firm of Jackson Lewis and aside from the typical barrage of letters sent to workers, management also made them sit through near daily group and one-on-one meetings, often directing teachers to leave their students with writing assignments during the two to three-hour-long meetings they were forced to attend. The Union filed close to half a dozen charges against management during the campaign for alleged violations of the National Labor Relations Act including illegal surveillance of employees, retaliation for union activity, and illegal transference of work. Despite all the pressure, workers voted 21-12 in favor of union representation. Now they will turn their focus to preparing for negotiations.

Contact:
Daniel Esakoff or Julie Berman
organize@nysutmail.org
Phone: 212-989-3470 Fax: 212-989-8154

Unloading on the Academy of Art & Commentary


2010_01_academy.jpg
The Academy of Art has gobbled up numerous buildings in the city and engaged in building code violoations in the process.  It's big business, but even business has to play be the rules.


Excerpts from:

August 8, 2004


This is a for profit school only concerned about making money to further the president's real estate empire.


At AAC, they pay the teachers about $30/hr for class time but don't pay for preparation time.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Commentary


The information above provides some interesting insight.  The implication being that $30/hr is not a lot for teachers (and this message is from 10 YEARS AGO!).  I agree that it is not, espeically in light of prep time not being paid (which is illegal, btw).  However, most ESL teachers teaching at one of the MANY for-profit schools in San Francisco (and elsewhere in the country) would be THRILLED to make $30/hr.  Teachers at schools like EC, EF, Embassy, Kaplan, St. Giles and others make far less.  They make anywhere from $20 to $25/hr.  Most make closer to $20.  It's crazy.  Teachers work hard and are not properly compensated.  Meanwhile, these schools/corporations are raking in the dough.  We have to make them accountable for their bank accounts and spread the wealth among their most valuable assets.  What is a school without teachers?  It is not a school.


Employee Review for Academy of Art University

http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-Academy-of-Art-University-RVW2126124.htm

Oct 26, 2012

I worked at Academy of Art University as a contractor (more than 3 years)

Pros: Great environment with wonderful teachers to work with.

Cons: Never got a raise even though I worked there for 3 years and was booked every single day of the week for all three years.

Advice to Management: Please give raises to reliable models who are on time and dedicated!

Saturday, October 18, 2014

NLRB Victory for Micropower Teachers


Board Decisions in Representation and Unfair Labor Practice Cases

New York, NY

Micropower USA Corp. The Employer having withdrawn its exceptions to the Regional Director’s overruling of its objections to an election held September 10 and 14, 2014, and with no other exceptions pending and the time allowed for such filing having expired, the Board adopted the Regional Director’s findings and recommendations and certified Petitioner New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the employees in the appropriate unit.


Tuesday, October 7, 2014

For-Profit ESL CAN Be Unionized!

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/16581/kaplan_teachers_contract_victory_may_light_organizing_spark_in_for_profit_e

BY REBECCA BURNS

Teachers at three Manhattan-based English language schools run by Kaplan, Inc. have won their first union contract with the corporation, breaking new ground in efforts to organize the booming for-profit education sector. In 2012, teachers at the three Kaplan International Center New York (KICNY) facilities became the first employees of private English as a Second Language (ESL) schools in the United States to unionize, but they have struggled since to settle a collective bargaining agreement. On Wednesday, they voted to adopt a contract that includes wage increases and greater workplace protections.
For-profit education “is an industry that’s notorious for low pay and no or few benefits,” says Bill O’Meara, president of the Newspaper Guild of New York, which represents the New York Kaplan teachers. “This initial contract is an important achievement in their working lives.”
In a statement sent to In These Times via e-mail, a Kaplan spokesperson said: “We believe that the two-year agreement ratified yesterday by the New York Newspaper Guild, covering approximately 65 teachers working at Kaplan’s three New York City ESL schools, is balanced and reasonable. It offers wage and benefit improvements to the teachers in New York. And it provides these Kaplan International Centers with the continued flexibility to operate their business in a way that best serves the interests of its students and will enable KIC to continue to provide jobs in the competitive New York ESL marketplace."  
The New York City teachers who voted to unionize in 2012 were the first Kaplan employees in the United States to do so. Paul Hlava, an English teacher at KIC’s Soho campus, says this quickly produced a ripple effect: Kaplan ESL instructors across the country received raises in what the union believes was an attempt to dissuade other schools from organizing. Meanwhile, says Hlava, the New York teachers were “stonewalled” as they fought for these same improvements for themselves.
In response, Kaplan teachers escalated their fight, reaching out to students and community members for support and riffing on the corporation’s brand-conscious image. For the last few years, Kaplan has sought to step up marketing of its ESL courses—which are separate from the corporation’s higher education division, but part of the larger corporation owned by Graham Holdings Co., the successor to the Washington Post Co.—with a social media campaign focused around the slogan “the Kaplan Experience,” including a “Kaplan Experience Journal” that encourages students to fill the pages with smiling photos and happy memories of their time spent at Kaplan. Teachers struck back by creating a video entitled “the Real Kaplan Experience,” which details their low wages and working conditions.
According to the video, though Kaplan reaped $49 million in profits in 2012, it keeps more than 90 percent of teachers at part-time status; the average Kaplan ESL teacher makes $25,000 a year. Teachers also say they lack access to benefits: Hlava notes that in his four years of working at Kaplan, he’s seen a doctor only once, and once taught classes while he had strep throat because he couldn’t afford to take days off without pay.
Through their new union contract, Kaplan teachers have won raises that include an increase in wages for time spent preparing classes from $8 an hour to $12 an hour, as well as a company-paid subsidy toward the cost of health insurance. The contract also mandates paid holidays and personal days for “senior part-time teachers” and protections for all part-timers against subcontracting work to non-union “teaching contractors.”
Kaplan teachers see affinity between their own struggle and those of other low-wage workers—particularly adjunct professors, whose struggle for better pay and working conditions has been driving a wave of labor actions at universities of late, and whose ranks are often especially populous at for-profit colleges. Hlava, a graduate of NYU who holds a master’s degree in writing and a teaching certification, has also spent time as an adjunct professor and sees many similarities between the two positions. Like adjuncts, he says, Kaplan teachers’ wages simply don’t match the level of debt they’ve often assumed to obtain professional qualifications. As a consequence, they frequently fall further and further behind on student loan payments even while they work multiple “professional” jobs.
Though Kaplan ESL schools are distinct from the company’s higher education division, they have the same parent corporation, and labor and education activists hope that the ESL teachers’ victory could help make inroads with organizing at for-profit colleges as well.
In recent years, many policymakers and education advocates have urged stricter federal regulations to protect students scammed by expensive degrees that have little practical value. Labor activists have also mulled unionizing for-profit education, which they believe could protect both students and workers.
But only two for-profit colleges—Art Institute schools in New York and Philadelphia—have unionized to date. Organizing efforts are often met with fierce resistance: A bid to unionize the Art Institute of Seattle in 2010 failed after the school reportedly hired a union-busting consultant, held mandatory anti-union meetings and made multiple daily phone calls to faculty.
For this reason, labor and education activists are heartened by the Kaplan teachers’ progress. A 2012 article by activists Joe Berry and Helena Worthen cites unionization at Kaplan as evidence of “stirrings of organization” in the for-profit education sector, and outlines the necessity of greater support for unionization at for-profit colleges: “In the rapidly expanding world of for-profit higher education, there are no faculty unions. It has been predicted that there never will be. These institutions stand ruthlessly by the policy of staying union-free. … The spirit of this organizing is not optimistic, but it is determined.”
Hlava also hopes that the contract victory will “send a message” to teachers at other for-profit schools. “It’s really a tragedy that many people in white-collar jobs think they don’t need unions,” he says, “There’s probably a direct correlation between that and why so many white-collar jobs have become so bad.”
O’Meara believes that the new contract will help set a wage floor for teachers at competitor schools. Kaplan is one of the biggest companies of its kind in the United States and in the world,” he says. “When they were trying to do things like constantly lowering their starting pay … They were leading a race to the bottom. I hope that other schools will now see that they can’t get away with this.”
Full disclosure: CWA is a website sponsor of In These Times. Sponsors have no role in editorial content. This author is a member of the Newspaper Guild.

Thinking about Tomorrow: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations in Higher Education (Conference, April 19-21, 2015, in NYC)


National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining

           in Higher Education and the Professions


When: April 19-21, 2015 - 42nd Annual Conference



Where:The National Center’s 42nd Annual Conference will take place at the CUNY Graduate Center in New York City.


Theme: Thinking about Tomorrow: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations in Higher Education.


Look for updates about the 2015 conference in future E-Notes and on our website and share the following


Specific Locations:
  • Sunday, April 19, 2015, CUNY Graduate Center: 365 5th Avenue, NY, NY, 10016
  • Monday-Tuesday, April 20-21, 2015, CUNY Graduate Center: 365 5th Avenue, NY, NY, 10016

Webcasts and Podcasts from the 41st Annual Conference

The National Center’s 41st Annual Conference, which took place on April.
Go website to get to webcasts from the 2014 conference.

Union Target: For-Profit ESL Schools

Excerpts from:
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/04/21/kaplan-faculty-union-sparks-new-interest-profit-unions-adjuncts

April 21, 2014
Colleen Flaherty

A relatively small group of New York City teachers’ announcement that they’d reached a collective bargaining agreement with their school might have gone unnoticed by those in higher education circles last week, but for one significant detail: their employer is Kaplan, Inc., a major player in for-profit higher education.
Collective bargaining agreements for faculty members in profit-education are extremely rare, but that’s something unions would like to change.
The 65 English-as-a-Second Language instructors teach mostly high school students at three Kaplan International Center locations in New York City and are affiliated with the Newspaper Guild of New York and Communications Workers of America. They voted to form a union in 2012 and recently won a two-year contract that ups their prep-time pay to $12 per hour from $8 and provides a modest health insurance subsidy and a 401(k) matching contribution. The contract also guarantees a minimum hourly rate for all employees, protections from subcontracting work and a clear discipline process, plus other non-financial gains.
Union experts took the development as an important precedent in the adjunct union movement, which so far has not penetrated the for-profit sector that employs so many adjuncts and -- union organizers say -- poses particular concerns about academic freedom. Virtually all professors at for-profit colleges and universities lack tenure, and the overwhelming majority are part-time. And while many have autonomy in the classroom, others are expected to teach standardized curriculum. Like their counterparts at nonprofit colleges and universities, adjuncts at for-profits face relatively low pay compared to tenure-line professors, little to no job security and other poor working conditions. (And many adjuncts take on courses at both for-profit and nonprofit institutions at the same time.)
Experts said many of those challenges could be addressed through collective bargaining with for-profit institutions, as in the Kaplan case.
“I think this is great – I don’t want to say ‘watershed,’ because it’s a small group – but it’s very, very important,” said Malini Cadambi Daniel, higher education campaign director for Service Employees International Union, of the Kaplan development. SEIU represents 18,000 adjunct professors and is recruiting more through metro-wide organizing strategies in at least nine major U.S. cities. “There has to be a lot more like this,” Cadambi Daniel said. “It has to happen.”
But Cadambi Daniel said in some ways organizing might be more simple. While for-profits may have ample funds to fight union drives, she said, at the same time “there’s something counterintuitive here.” Where union drives have become ideological battles at nonprofits, such as at religiously affiliated colleges and universities that have fought National Labor Relations Board jurisdiction over their campuses, for-profit institutions are more likely to respond to union drives as “business decisions” only, she said. So some institutions might decide early on in the process that it’s easier – or cheaper -- to work with unions than against them.
In addition to the recent Kaplan drive, non-tenure-track faculty have formed unions at two Art Institute locations. The first formed in 1986, in affiliation with American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union. A second formed later in New York, with the American Federation of Teachers.
But about three times as many have tried and failed, including at the Art Institute’s Seattle location, where adjuncts tried to organize with the American Federation of Teachers in 2010. The union was voted down. But it seems the drive at least helped to better working conditions for adjuncts there. In a 2012 article about adjuncts and for-profits, Joe Berry and Helena Worthen, both adjunct activists, said that “Class sizes were cut, many part-timers got more work, and teacher facilities were improved.”
But the authors note that “[w]hat teachers did not get was increased control over how they did their work, or how students were taught, which would have come with a successful union drive.”
In a statement, Emily Lessem, a Kaplan teacher who chairs one of the New York units, said that while the agreement was “far from perfect, it will provide job protections and benefits and have a powerful impact on Kaplan teachers in New York City and across the country.”
Bill O’Meara, president of the Guild, said of the Kaplan teachers: “These are educated workers who knew they deserved more than they were getting and they knew they needed a union to get it.”
William Herbert, executive director of the Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions at Hunter College of the City University of New York, said it’s “probable” that similar union drives are to come, as adjuncts at for-profits seek job security, improvements in their working conditions and even retirement benefits.

Monday, October 6, 2014

ESL Teachers Getting Short End of the Stick

Excerpts from
http://jimmyesl.com/esl-industry-2/esl-teachers-getting-short-end-of-the-stick/

James Soller
February 28, 2014

Anyone that has taught English as a second language at a for profit school understands that the  ESL industry in the United States is highly unregulated, unfair and cutthroat in regards to the treatment of teachers. Despite a bear economy, ESL schools, such as Kaplan [see story below about how Kaplan, NYC recently unionized!], Intrax, Berlitz not only remain profitable, but continue to grow. In fact, the ESL industry in the United States has been booming during the past couple of decades.   Each year thousands of students from around the globe pour into the United States to study at ESL institutes with the hope of increasing their own job prospects back home or getting accepted into an American university.

Unfortunately, ESL teachers throughout the United States are seeing their wages stay the same or even decrease in many instances despite a record number of students and growth in the ESL industry. The vast majority of ESL teachers working at private institutes  are technically employed as ‘part-time’ workers with hourly wages that have stayed the same since the early 2000’s. In addition, it is rare for an ESL institute to offer its teachers health insurance and job security is shaky at best.

Why do ESL teachers get such a short end of the stick? There are a few reasons.

[One] reason is that ESL institutes are great at strategically hiring middle management and lower management staff that are promised bonuses if they can cut corners and increase profit. Well, it is easy to figure out that the easiest way to increase profit in any industry is to cut worker’s pay and deny benefits.

The bottom line is that things need to change!

How NYC Kaplan Teachers Won a Union Contract

http://indypendent.org/2014/05/04/how-nyc-kaplan-teachers-won-union-contract

On one side of town, tourists and young professionals head downtown on light rail: clean, air-conditioned, fast. If there’s a problem with service, the city diverts buses to help.
On the other side of town, workers wait at bus stops. The buses that carry them to work come less and less frequently, thanks to service cuts. Drivers struggle to get through their routes in less time.
Both scenarios are part of a promising trend: transit ridership is at its highest since 1956, with 10.7 million trips in 2013, according to the American Public Transportation Association.
This is despite widespread cuts to bus and rail service—and rising fares. The 2008 economic crisis started the pinch, but federal and local officials have continued to squeeze.
Yet “young people are rejecting cars in record numbers; they are moving to urban America,” Amalgamated Transit Union President Larry Hanley said at the recent Labor Notes Conference.
Whether the spike in rider numbers is caused by environmental consciousness, urbanization, or belt-tightening, clearly it calls for more transit funds, both for more frequent service and for infrastructure—not for cutbacks.
And the spending needs to be spread across our communities—not target one area at the expense of another.
On one side of town, tourists and young professionals head downtown on light rail: clean, air-conditioned, fast. If there’s a problem with service, the city diverts buses to help.
On the other side of town, workers wait at bus stops. The buses that carry them to work come less and less frequently, thanks to service cuts. Drivers struggle to get through their routes in less time.
Both scenarios are part of a promising trend: transit ridership is at its highest since 1956, with 10.7 million trips in 2013, according to the American Public Transportation Association.
This is despite widespread cuts to bus and rail service—and rising fares. The 2008 economic crisis started the pinch, but federal and local officials have continued to squeeze.
Yet “young people are rejecting cars in record numbers; they are moving to urban America,” Amalgamated Transit Union President Larry Hanley said at the recent Labor Notes Conference.
Whether the spike in rider numbers is caused by environmental consciousness, urbanization, or belt-tightening, clearly it calls for more transit funds, both for more frequent service and for infrastructure—not for cutbacks.
On one side of town, tourists and young professionals head downtown on light rail: clean, air-conditioned, fast. If there’s a problem with service, the city diverts buses to help.
On the other side of town, workers wait at bus stops. The buses that carry them to work come less and less frequently, thanks to service cuts. Drivers struggle to get through their routes in less time.
Both scenarios are part of a promising trend: transit ridership is at its highest since 1956, with 10.7 million trips in 2013, according to the American Public Transportation Association.
This is despite widespread cuts to bus and rail service—and rising fares. The 2008 economic crisis started the pinch, but federal and local officials have continued to squeeze.
Yet “young people are rejecting cars in record numbers; they are moving to urban America,” Amalgamated Transit Union President Larry Hanley said at the recent Labor Notes Conference.
Whether the spike in rider numbers is caused by environmental consciousness, urbanization, or belt-tightening, clearly it calls for more transit funds, both for more frequent service and for infrastructure—not for cutbacks.