Monday, April 13, 2015

Time is Money: Reporting Time Rules in California



May 21, 2014, Work Time Series

Reporting time pay is one of the provisions of California wage and hour law that is often overlooked by employers.  The requirement to pay reporting time is set forth in Section 5 of all but one of the 17 Wage Orders, and it guarantees workers that they will be paid for at least half of their scheduled shift in the event they are sent home early.  It also provides for a minimum of two hours of pay for employees who are required to report to work for a second time in one workday.  The purpose of the provision is to discourage employers from deliberately over-staffing and then sending home excess workers without any pay.  Yet, many employers are unaware of these rules!

For more information, go to
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/faq_reportingtimepay.htm


Sunday, April 12, 2015

ALJ Decides Unlawful Termination Case in EF International Hearing


ALJ Decides Unlawful Termination Case in EF International Hearing Testimony via International Video Conferencing San Francisco, CA – The General Counsel brought a complaint against EF International Language Schools, Inc. (EF), alleging that EF terminated the Charging Party because of her protected, concerted activities, and threatened her with unspecified reprisals if she continued to engage in such actions that included her speaking out about teachers’ terms and conditions of employment at meetings and in group emails. During the trial, the NLRB for the first time in the Agency’s history conducted a trial examination of a witness via international video conferencing. The administrative law judge found that EF violated the NLRA and ordered that it cease and desist from threatening or discharging employees for their protected, concerted activities. The administrative law judge also ordered that EF offer full reinstatement to the Charging Party and make her whole for any loss of earnings or other benefits suffered as a result of her unlawful termination. Finally, the administrative law judge determined that the witness’s testimony obtained via international video conferencing could be evaluated on an equal footing with the testimony of witnesses appearing in person at the hearing. This case was investigated and tried by Region 20 Field Attorney Jason Wong.