Friday, October 30, 2015

St. Giles Teachers Review Proposal that Includes Seniority and Union Security

Bargaining bulletin #3
Your bargaining committee met with St. Giles’ lawyer on Monday absent any representation by management. Megan remains on maternity leave, with her date of return still up in the air. As we shared a comprehensive proposal in September, a response was due from St. Giles in this meeting.
The Company lawyer offered a partial proposal featuring “non-economic terms.” Because Megan is out on maternity leave, the lawyer is not able to discuss the money items. The lawyer walked us through the proposal, which was responsive to our proposal. In many cases, it appears the Company adopted language from our proposal, but was careful to avoid such important items as definitions of “full time,” “part-time,” “fixed term” and other phrases used to describe St. Giles teachers. The lawyer agrees that there has been inconsistent use of terms to describe a teacher’s tenure with the Company. Your committee sees that even more critical work is ahead of us in the bargaining.
However, the Company did seem to agree on some important points, which we hope will make more space to discuss bringing health benefits and pay for all work to our members.
According to unit member, Tanner Stinchfield, “We’ve gotten started on a path toward seniority, hiring procedures, a grievance procedure and other union security provisions.”
Committee members also discussed the importance of making every effort to hire and promote women and minorities, as there is a perception that the majority of the more remunerative positions seem not to be assigned with that in mind.
The lawyer restated the Company’s offer to “open the books,“ and your committee stated (again) that we would like to see them. Your committee is concerned with past information that funds from the SF school were shifted to New York as stated in an all-hands meeting on July 2, 2015. A case could be made that had those funds not been shifted, the SF school would be in a stronger position to meet many if not all of the economic proposals that your committee has put forward.
The Company lawyer hopes that Megan will return to bargaining in November. Your committee has made it clear on the record that we expect St. Giles to present an alternate should Megan not be available for the next session. The parties exchanged dates for most of November and the first week of December.
Representing the bargaining team: Adam Benson, Tanner Stinchfield (sitting in for Britt Lollis) and Kat Anderson, Guild staff, with support from Jessica Mironov.
Representing the Company: Mark Ross, lawyer.

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Editorial by Concerned ESL Teacher

There is no doubt that the for-profit ESL industry has been profiting off its employees and been a breeding ground for wage theft. Slowly but surely things have started to change, but that is because there are employees fighting back. There have been stories of institutions such as Kaplan’s employees unionizing and filing class action lawsuits. I have had colleagues receive notices about class action settlements for back wages from prep time. All of this is good and provides a much needed change for these companies to comply. Even the ones that never make the news because they have been settled in confidential out-of-court settlements help force these companies to change and comply with the law. But the one thing that they have in common is they required employees to fight and speak up. This is something that is not easy to do and often or not the employees who do fight back face retaliation in the form of being harassed and bullied to ultimately terminated. So before you cash that class action settlement check that you received in the mail from working at a for-profit ESL school five years ago, please
take the time to remember to thank those employees who have been willing to fight the fight.

Here is a list of things you can do to help fight back:

1) Learn the basics of employment law, especially wage and hour laws for hourly or non-exempt employees. If you are in states such as California and New York the laws are fairly strict towards employers. It is our duty as citizens to be informed about these things. Many Employment Law firm websites provide excellent sources of information for explaining these laws in less convoluted layman’s terms.

2) Read your employee handbook and look for how your employer defines their own policies. Are they congruent with current laws? Often times they are not. One of the most common things that I noticed in for-profit ESL schools is the amount of
masquerading they do with trying to legitimize how they break the law, especially in the area of prep time or lack thereof.

3) Report things you think are being violated in writing, such as in email. Even if the organization has a so-called policy for complaints to be made orally, try to still do this as best you can, even if it means emailing a colleague. As a former employee who was retaliated for complaining about public policy issues, my smoking gun for evidence was the complaints in emails and how the managers responded inappropriately. Be wary, companies are becoming wise to this and really trying to avoid implicating themselves in emails, which is why it is important to try and do it.

4) Become familiar with government organizations that handle employment law claims. These are sometimes the first steps in fighting back. Often times they do have hotlines that can answer legal questions and help you file. Some examples include the EEOC, DLSE, and DOL.

5) Write anonymous reviews about the school on sites such as Glassdoor and indeed.com. This gives an accurate portrayal of what it is really like to work at places and sometimes it is one of the safer ways to speak up.

6) Work in solidarity with other employees. This is probably the biggest criticism I had with many of my colleagues when I fought a for-profit ESL school. There was a lack of solidarity with the other employees. When I requested one to become a witness in my case he became too scared of retaliation and reported it to management who told him to cease contact with me. I get how you can be scared of retaliation, which is something that is very real. But you can’t go through life being a coward, and at some point you should do the right thing. My case could have been a bigger class action case had my colleagues been more willing to fight with me instead of becoming scared and running, which is exactly what these for-profit ESL schools want. There is safety in numbers and this certainly makes retaliation much more difficult. So please, try to support your colleagues who speak up, not only do they really need your support on an emotional level, but it makes things safer for everyone.

7) Find local employment law firms in your area. One of the biggest surprises I found is the number of attorneys who are willing to work on contingency (work for free until settlement). Many of these firms will offer free consultations, which can be useful for obtaining legal information and learning about what steps to take. Should you decide to seek the help of an employment law firm realize you are entering a contract and have realistic expectations on a settlement. Yes, many of these firms genuinely care about employee rights, but they are also a business.

8) Read books on employment rights and laws. One of the best books that I read and followed a lot of advice from was “Stand Up For Yourself Without Getting Fired: Resolve Workplace Crises Before You Quit, Get Axed or Sue the Bastards” by Donna Ballman. I read this book while I was still employed and it helped me with understanding the process better. It gave me such ideas as how to write a formal complaint and suggest remedies to my former employer such as professional mediation. Ultimately, my former employer failed to do anything and I was terminated, but my documentation and desire to seek remedies helped me to secure a lawyer to help sue the bastards.

*This is not meant to be professional legal advice. Only a lawyer can give you that. My goal is to point employees in the right direction and encourage you to stand up for yourself. This is an industry that will only change if people start fighting back. Complacency will only continue to perpetuate the status quo that many of these for-profit ESL schools are banking on.


Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Another Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against a For-Profit ESL School (Intrax)

A Class Action Suit has been filed against INTRAX in San Diego Co.  The suit claims unlawful wage deductions, failure to pay minimum wage, failure to pay overtime, failure to provide paid rest periods, failure to pay all vested vacation, failure to pay wages upon termination of employment, failure to provide accurate wage statements, unfair competition, and related claims for civil penalties under the California Labor Code.


Claims apply to those who worked for the company between July 30, 2010 and July 1, 2015.  Any Intrax instructors who worked during this period and want to collect money owed to them should contact attorneys representing the class action.

https://www.robbinsarroyo.com/attorneys/

Robbins Arroyo LLP
Brian J. Robbins
Diane E. Richard
600 B Street, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA  92101


Telephone: (619) 525 - 3990
Fax: (619) 525 - 3991
Email: drichard@robbinsarroyo.com

case number: 37-2014-00025454-CU-OE-CTL
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO


Friday, October 2, 2015

EF International Must Cease and Desist, Etc (as per NLRB Order)



ORDER The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Respondent, EF International Language Schools, Inc., San Francisco, California, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall 1. Cease and desist from


(a) Threatening employees with unspecified reprisals if they engage in protected concerted activities.


(b) Discharging employees because they engage in protected concerted activities.


(c) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act. 2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act.


(a) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, offer Andrea Jesse full reinstatement to her former job that job no longer exists, to a substantially equivalent position, without prejudice to her seniority or any other rights or privileges previously enjoyed.


(b) Make Andrea Jesse whole for any loss of earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of the discrimination against her, in the manner set forth in the remedy section of the decision.


(c) Compensate Andrea Jesse for the adverse tax consequences, if any, of receiving a lump-sum backpay award, and submit the appropriate documentation to the Social Security Administration so that when backpay is paid to Andrea Jesse, it will be allocated to the appropriate calendar quarters.


(d) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, remove from its files any reference to the unlawful discharge, and within 3 days thereafter, notify the employee in writing that this has been done and that the discharge will not be used against her in any way.


(e) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such additional time as the Regional Director may allow for good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place designated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, social security payment records, timecards, personnel records and reports, and all other records, including an electronic copy of such records if stored in electronic form, necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due under the terms of this Order.


(f) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at its San Francisco, California facility copies of the attached notice marked “Appendix.”4 Copies of the notice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 20, after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted. In addition to physical posting of paper notices, notices shall be distributed electronically, such as by email, posting on an intranet or an internet site, and/or other electronic means, if the Respondent customarily communicates with its employees by such means. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. If the Respondent has gone out of business or closed the facility involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and 4 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the National Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.” mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all current employees and former employees employed by the Respondent at any time since November 20, 2013.


(g) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file with the Regional Director for Region 20 a sworn certification of a responsible official on a form provided by the Region attesting to the steps that the Respondent has taken to comply.


Dated, Washington, D.C. October 1, 2105